Page 20 of 20 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314151617181920
Results 381 to 399 of 399

Thread: Albert Hall EH release

  1. #381
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,841
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 4,064 Times in 351 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenders Fingers View Post
    Stone Free ......... Included
    Effects .......... None, well not any that you reference!
    Source?

  2. #382
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,145
    Thanks
    2,845
    Thanked 1,963 Times in 844 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    From what I have been informed. How reliable that is does remain questionable but it is from someone who saw this!
    "That's the best news I ever heard" Bob Dylan

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Fenders Fingers For This Useful Post:


  4. #383
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,145
    Thanks
    2,845
    Thanked 1,963 Times in 844 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    Quote Originally Posted by Roland Stone View Post
    And meanwhile we still don't have reliable answers to the questions: (1) Is "Stone Free" included? (2) Are the in-camera 'psychedelic" effects excluded? I know a couple of people who have seen the movie, but they aren't astute enough fans to answer those basic questions.
    See your own post #300 in this very thread!

    Maybe others may want to review posts here too :-)
    "That's the best news I ever heard" Bob Dylan

  5. #384
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,367
    Thanks
    97
    Thanked 678 Times in 246 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenders Fingers View Post
    See your own post #300 in this very thread!

    Maybe others may want to review posts here too :-)
    That was based on hearsay. Without resurrecting the debate on the reliability of that source, what I'm grousing about is that its two years later and NOBODY HERE ON CTT has reported on their personal observations of what's in the movie. It's all still just hearsay. I recently spoke with someone who claims to have seen the movie a dozen times. He also claims to have a "trailer" for the movie. But while raving about the film no end, mainly about its visual attributes and IMAX potential, he still couldn't answer those two simple questions.

  6. #385
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,145
    Thanks
    2,845
    Thanked 1,963 Times in 844 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    But information from your "someone" would remain by your terms hearsay!

    If I were to say I had seen the film / doc, and A,B, and C where included while X,Y and z omitted / edited that too would be hearsay!!
    "That's the best news I ever heard" Bob Dylan

  7. #386
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,367
    Thanks
    97
    Thanked 678 Times in 246 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    If you testify to what you have personally seen that is not hearsay. If CTT is the "court" then hearsay is a statement made outside the court by someone else. When you come to CTT and say "she told me she saw 'Stone Free', that is considered less reliable than if you told us you saw it yourself because we can "cross-examine" you with questions about the details to test your memory and credibility. Her uncorroborated hearsay remains unconvincing until she comes here to CTT herself to answer questions about what she saw.

  8. #387
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,145
    Thanks
    2,845
    Thanked 1,963 Times in 844 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    Wow, CTT is a court. I never knew :-)
    "That's the best news I ever heard" Bob Dylan

  9. #388
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,367
    Thanks
    97
    Thanked 678 Times in 246 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenders Fingers View Post
    Wow, CTT is a court. I never knew :-)
    CTT is the highest authority for all matters concerning Jimi Hendrix. And by "highest" I mean, not necessariy stoned, but beautiful!

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Roland Stone For This Useful Post:


  11. #389
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Bay of Plenty New Zealand
    Posts
    166
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    l see no reason why the concert wasnt completely filmed, so why would they leave out such a ripper of a song such as stone free from the film

  12. #390
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,367
    Thanks
    97
    Thanked 678 Times in 246 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    There was a rumour that someone accidentally destroyed it, or that the cameras weren't rolling yet. Who knows. Just like why would they put in those stupid in-camera effects and how did they get rid of them, if they did.

  13. #391
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Bay of Plenty New Zealand
    Posts
    166
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    please dont ruin my buzz, this will be the high light of my life if l could see this in high definition quality at a very unreasonable sound level

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to themusocat For This Useful Post:


  15. #392
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,145
    Thanks
    2,845
    Thanked 1,963 Times in 844 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    All hearsay of course!

    All this is already covered in this thread I believe.
    "That's the best news I ever heard" Bob Dylan

  16. #393
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,145
    Thanks
    2,845
    Thanked 1,963 Times in 844 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    Quote Originally Posted by Roland Stone View Post
    And meanwhile we still don't have reliable answers to the questions: (1) Is "Stone Free" included? (2) Are the in-camera 'psychedelic" effects excluded? I know a couple of people who have seen the movie, but they aren't astute enough fans to answer those basic questions.
    So the viewers you know / spoke to cannot see if sparklers were added to the movie they saw?

    You don't need to be astute to be able to answer that question so maybe they never saw it in the first instance?
    "That's the best news I ever heard" Bob Dylan

  17. #394
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,841
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 4,064 Times in 351 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    Hey, I know a handful of people who heard the Black Gold tape, does that mean i can have a copy? No!

    The RAH DVD/BR will be released in February 2019, and pre-orders will be taken well before Christmas 2018.

    I didnt hear that from anyone, i made it up just then!

    Seriously though if 'they' dont get their 'act' together by then, I really dont think it could become a financial success, all the fans who were at the show(s) will be gone and the piratebay/youtube generation wont buy.....

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to johanincr For This Useful Post:


  19. #395
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    3,703
    Thanks
    1,702
    Thanked 2,092 Times in 638 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    Quote Originally Posted by johanincr View Post
    Hey, I know a handful of people who heard the Black Gold tape, does that mean i can have a copy? No!

    The RAH DVD/BR will be released in February 2019, and pre-orders will be taken well before Christmas 2018.

    I didnt hear that from anyone, i made it up just then!

    Seriously though if 'they' dont get their 'act' together by then, I really dont think it could become a financial success, all the fans who were at the show(s) will be gone and the piratebay/youtube generation wont buy.....
    I want to see it in the cinema with a big screen and massive sound!

    Edit:

    With Stone Free
    And without sparkles
    Please.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Ezy Rider For This Useful Post:


  21. #396
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,919
    Thanks
    1,012
    Thanked 456 Times in 211 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    Quote Originally Posted by Roland Stone View Post
    There was a rumour that someone accidentally destroyed it, or that the cameras weren't rolling yet. Who knows. Just like why would they put in those stupid in-camera effects and how did they get rid of them, if they did.
    I was under the impression that the first concert was filmed but after processing it they discovered that it was underexposed (dark). Henceforth the second concert has the house lights up for proper exposure. The effects were done post production as it is impossible to hold a sparkler in front of a camera and achieve that effect. I am hoping that the actual full film does not have that issue as it seems we all got a "dubbed" copy.

  22. #397
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,367
    Thanks
    97
    Thanked 678 Times in 246 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharpstat View Post
    I was under the impression that the first concert was filmed but after processing it they discovered that it was underexposed (dark). Henceforth the second concert has the house lights up for proper exposure. The effects were done post production as it is impossible to hold a sparkler in front of a camera and achieve that effect. I am hoping that the actual full film does not have that issue as it seems we all got a "dubbed" copy.
    I'm no expert. Can you explain why its impossible to get those effects "in camera" through multiple exposure?

  23. #398
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Bay of Plenty New Zealand
    Posts
    166
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    Quote Originally Posted by Roland Stone View Post
    There was a rumour that someone accidentally destroyed it, or that the cameras weren't rolling yet. Who knows. Just like why would they put in those stupid in-camera effects and how did they get rid of them, if they did.
    k, well, if so, there should still be something there. l mean , multiple camera angles, if a master copy had been destroyed, there would still be the multiple camera angles left thoe, would'nt there, so not everything would of been destroyed, or am l missing something here

  24. #399
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,919
    Thanks
    1,012
    Thanked 456 Times in 211 Posts

    Re: Albert Hall EH release

    Quote Originally Posted by Roland Stone View Post
    I'm no expert. Can you explain why its impossible to get those effects "in camera" through multiple exposure?
    Sure it could be done using a double exposure. I am going by what was told to me by RLB.

Similar Threads

  1. Royal Albert Hall
    By rocknroll in forum CD Cover Art
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-01-16, 03:36 PM
  2. Royal Albert Hall In 5.1
    By MourningStar in forum Video Torrents
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 01-09-14, 01:14 AM
  3. Royal Albert Hall
    By ChrisdeB in forum Re-Seed Requests
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-26-11, 05:59 PM
  4. Royal Albert Hall
    By Roland Stone in forum Third Stone From The Sun
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-23-09, 12:56 AM
  5. Royal Albert Hall In 5.1 - 24 FEB 69
    By tbozzio in forum Re-Seed Requests
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-31-08, 04:34 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBitty (VBTT) 4 for XBT v1.1 CUSTOM by Toolmanwill